Eram Sum Ero.

Oremus Mare.

I believe in you.

3/30/2026

“How do you count?”

By proper context and category.

“What do you mean?”

Well, the number 3 is one number. If you disagree, then how many numbers is the number 3? If you say the number 3 is three numbers, then which three distinct numbers is it? If you say 1 + 1 + 1, well, the number 1 is only one number.

So, if the number 3 is three numbers, then the question may be: how do YOU count?

Every individual number is one number.

The number 7 is one number, one digit, and seven units.

The number 10 is one number, two digits, and ten units.

Once you understand this, we may begin counting properly, if we both establish the principle of charity. Explaining why something or someone is wrong because the language is twisted or taken out of context is not impressive and risks crossing a line into abusive and/or potentially terroristic tactics for the aim of rhetoric maxing and social validation.

If you understand that the number 3 is one number, then your confusion about “how can three be one?” evaporates into mid air.

Now, this won’t clear up the totality of your confusion or quest to find answers, but that’s okay! In this life, you will always have a question of some kind and with every answer you get, at least one question will follow. It’s okay to be curious and considerate while self reflecting.

Reflect beyond rhetoric and write down what you discover.

If you find yourself being someone who affirms that the line of questioning “how many Gods did/did not die on the cross?” is bad, dishonest, sloppy, etc. but then you use that same strategy, what does that say about you? Obviously a real Muslim Apologetic wouldn’t stoop to suck a level that lacks such a deep level of integrity, surely.

A real Orthodox Muslim wouldn’t admit that under relative identity, the Holy Trinity is coherent, but then pander to ignorant viewers who don’t know any better for money while pretending s/he is unaware of how the Holy Trinity can make sense, right?

Individuals who reflect with “the most honest man with integrity” surely wouldn’t intentionally strawman language models to necessarily reach their own desired conclusion, right?